Hi every one. Before of my talk with you I must say that my english language is weak. know this point in the every post that I will put in my blog. If you see every kind Language mistakes in my writes I have please of you say me. Thaks.
My master Thesis is in subject of substance but from farabi view. till now I understand that this philosopher is very Affected of Aristotle organon’s, special in this subject. my mean is that aristote in his organon have trends to quiddity till being. He diagnosis two substances. primary Substance and Secondary substance. Substance of first is same external being for egsample this human” or this pen” but substance of second is conception of that external thing or is quiddity. But Aristotle in the metaphisice backs of his idea and say that substance is one and it is external thing.
Now mister farabi is extremely trends to first Aristotle idea. He divide existence to section: Bing and quiddity.then he divide quiddity to section: substance and attribute.This was abstract of my research till now.
Now question is that Why farabi puts substance Of divisions of quiddity not being?
.It is very problem. Be wait till Next results and say your idea please. Thanks
hamid khosravani
درباره این سایت